Main Menu
Articles
Books & Media
Education
Events
Links
News & Headlines
People
Speeches
Legalities
Issues
About
|
White America's Positive Contribution to the Civil Rights Movement Page 1
by Roger Smith
"The white man ain't never done nuthin' for me" is the statement you will more than likely hear if you ask many
black Americans their opinion of what white America has done for them.There is anger in their words as they recall
their own experiences with white people as well as the experiences that have been told by each generation of blacks.
However, as with most stories which have been told over a period of time, things tend to get lost in the translation
and, fact and fiction become intertwined.
To say that the white man (or woman) has never done anything for black people would truly be on the side of fiction.
For those of us who like to deal in reality, we know differently. Although blacks have fought valiantly for their own
cause, it would have all been in vain if sympathetic whites did not lend a helping hand. Let us recall the 1954
Brown vs Board of Education decision.
If it was not for Chief Justice Fred Vinson's unexpected death then
Earl Warren would not have succeeded him,
and Vinson, who seemed more conservative than Warren, probably would have not made the same decision.
Also, we need to remember the Emmitt Till
(CAUTION: CONTAINS GRAPHIC PICTURE) case, where an all white jury acquitted the two white men accused of
torturing and murdering him. This clearly shows that if all of white America was intent on stopping the Civil
Rights Movement, they could have easily done it. Usually when people refer to the
Civil Rights Movement, we think
of the years from 1954 - 1965, but "the Movement" has almost been around for as long as America itself. In 1688,
and sixty-nine years after the first black slaves arrived in America,
The German Mennonite Resolution against
slavery became the first formal protest of its kind. The "Resolution" opened the door for other anti-slavery
groups but more importantly it made America and future Americans more conscious of the cause and its connection
to freedom. "We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal, that they are endowed
by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness...."
These words from the
Declaration
of Independence are supposed to mean freedom for those who live in America and pay tribute to its flag, but,
ironically, when it was ratified it did not include blacks. Although there were many who were against slavery,
they were unable to rid blacks of their slave status. This was due to the fact that most of the southern states,
in particularly South Carolina and Georgia, were pro-slavery and most of the northern states, and their delegates,
worried about the economic consequences, since most of their ports profited from slave ships. However, in an
effort to bring attention to the slavery issue,
Thomas Jefferson drafted a clause against
the use of the slave trade that
he hoped would become part of the Declaration of Independence. It did not. Although Jefferson's clause was omitted,
it again helped to heighten the awareness of slavery, and even affected other notable personalities of the time,
such as George Washington who, in his last
will and testament, freed the slaves that were under his charge, and
Benjamin Franklin who, in 1789 and while
president of the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery, addressed the public in an attempt
to discourage slavery and support the emancipation of black people. By the turn of the century, anti-slavery
societies and abolitionists were a regular part of the American culture. More whites were becoming sympathetic
to the plights of blacks and were willing to actively participate on their behalf but, because of this, America
was becoming a nation divided. In 1820,
John Quincy Adams
wrote in his diary:
It is among the evils of slavery that it taints the very sources of moral principle.... The bargain between
freedom and slavery contained in then Constitution of the United States is morally and politically vicious, inconsistent
with the principals upon which alone our revolution can be justified; cruel and oppressive, by riveting the chains of
slavery, by pledging the faith of freedom to maintain and perpetuate the tyranny of the master; and grossly unequal
and impolitic, by admitting that slaves are at once the enemies to be kept in subjection, property to be secured or
restored to their owners, and persons not to be represented themselves, but for whom their masters are privileged with
nearly a double share of representation. The consequence has been that the slave representation has governed the
Union.... If the Union must be dissolved, slavery is precisely the question upon which it ought to break.
This statement would turn out to be prophetic, because in forty-one years that is precisely what would happen.
© Copyright
2004 by Roger Smith; All Rights Reserved
1
2
next page->
|
|